Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags

'Twas ever thus....

Dec. 1st, 2025 03:53 pm
oursin: Painting of Clio Muse of History by Artemisia Gentileschi (Clio)
[personal profile] oursin

There was hoohahing going on last week on bluesky anent people pirating books on account authors do not need the money and should be creating for Love of Art.

And I will concede that when it comes to Evil Exploitative Academic Publishing Empires, I cannot get my knickers in a twist over people downloading papers for which they have not paid the extortionate fee, none of which goes to author of the paper or the reviewers who reviewed it for the journal in question (wot, me, bitter?) - in fact I will be over here cheering or offering to use such library access as I have to get access and offer a copy.

But honestly the Average Author of fictional works is not making molto moolah but is probably supporting themselves by doing something else or being supported by someone else (hey, Ursula K Le Guin? e.g. mentions somewhere she was a housewife when she first started out) and writing is not their sole occupation or source of remuneration.

And even writers who we look back on as Important and Successful had their money problems: Hardship grant applications to the Royal Literary Fund... show authors at their most vulnerable:

Nobody goes into writing for the money: today, professional authors in the UK earn a median income of £7,000, according to the Authors’ Licensing and Collecting Society. Looking at the starry names awarded grants through the RLF’s history makes clear that the challenges are not new. However, Kemp thinks the problem has become more acute in some regards. “The kinds of deal you get with a publisher as a mid-list fiction writer has gone down, down, down, down, down.” Twenty or 30 years ago, such writers could survive; it is now much tougher, he says. Big publishers are “paying large amounts of money to a small number of writers”. A “tiny percentage actually survive on what they’re making from writing.”

But looking back over the history of the fund:
“On the one hand there are people like Joyce and DH Lawrence, who are early in their careers, and indeed Doris Lessing, who are struggling to get going, who have made a mark but are finding it hard to make ends meet. And at the other end there are people like Coleridge, and more recently Edna O’Brien, who have had stellar careers, and you’d have hoped actually were doing OK, but the vicissitudes of a writer’s life mean that sometimes it goes to pot.”

I wonder how far the All More Complicated Stories behind the need are in the documentation, though:
Many documents show writers at the most vulnerable times of their lives, often in precarious positions early in their careers; everything from feeble book sales to illness to messy marriages to grief is chronicled here.... Nesbit, author of The Railway Children, wrote in an August 1914 letter that the shock of her husband’s death “overcame me completely and now my brain will not do the poetry romance and fairy tales by which I have earned most of my livelihood”.

She was, as I recall, the principle breadwinner of their polyamorous menage and support of its offspring. (Personally we should have danced on Hubert Bland's grave.)

"Rabbit rabbit rabbit!"

Dec. 1st, 2025 04:37 pm
mdlbear: Three rabbits dancing (rabbit-rabbit-rabbit)
[personal profile] mdlbear

Welcome to December, 2025!

All That We See or Seem by Ken Liu

Dec. 1st, 2025 11:34 am
lightreads: a partial image of a etymology tree for the Indo-European word 'leuk done in white neon on black'; in the lower left is (Default)
[personal profile] lightreads
All That We See or Seem

3/5. Marketed as scifi, but it’s actually a near future AI tech thriller about the loner hacker who gets tangled up in the search for a missing woman whose job is weaving AI-enhanced mass dream experiences.

Meh. A lot of the AI speculation here is really interesting. It’s all extremely plausible – the internet mostly just bots shouting at each other, everyone with means having a personal AI assistant who is trained to think specifically like them, what new kinds of art really draw people in as authentic, etc. – but speculates about these things while touching lightly on how they are bad and how they are good. Letting it be complicated with AI, can you imagine? Is that even allowed? In the era where I have been told that I’m a “traitor to humanity” for occasionally finding a particular AI powered accessibility tool to be extremely helpful in ways no prior tool has ever come remotely close to? Oh but surely we can’t have nuance in these conversations, oh no.

Unfortunately, everything else about this book is meh. The villain POV (please stop), the weirdly flat delivery of events that are supposed to be tense or upsetting, the main character and the shallow thriller treatment of her trauma, the “twist” in the epilogue.

This makes me not want to read his fantasy, actually. Does it have the same problems, or is he trying too hard to write like a thriller guy?

Content notes: Violence, slavery.

Five Things AuroraT Said

Dec. 1st, 2025 02:35 pm
[syndicated profile] otw_news_feed

Posted by Caitlynne

Every month or so the OTW will be doing a Q&A with one of its volunteers about their experiences in the organization. The posts express each volunteer’s personal views and do not necessarily reflect the views of the OTW or constitute OTW policy. Today’s post is with AuroraT, who volunteers as an administrative volunteer for Open Doors.

How does what you do as a volunteer fit into what the OTW does?
I’m an administrative volunteer with the Open Doors Committee, which helps import at-risk digital archives to AO3 in order to preserve fanworks that might otherwise be lost. I’m responsible for project management, walking an archive and its archivist through our lengthy import process. We put a lot of effort into keeping track of the metadata for each work and respecting creators’ privacy, so a lot of what I do involves managing spreadsheets and communicating with the archivist, other committees in the OTW, and other teams in the Open Doors Committee. I also write documentation for the committee, updating or writing down our procedures and information about the archives I’m managing.

What is a typical week like for you as a volunteer?
There’s a lot of variety in what an import project requires, so my weeks tend to vary a lot. Sometimes, I’ll spend one of our weekly meetings working on a single task, such as preparing the documents we need to initiate a new import or cleaning up a spreadsheet. Other times, I’ll jump around from task to task: emailing a different committee, discussing a procedure change with other admin volunteers, responding to feedback on documentation I wrote, creating the AO3 collection where we’ll add the works we imported, answering a ticket from a creator wanting to claim works we previously imported, and so on.

What made you decide to volunteer?
I’m a huge supporter of the OTW’s mission to preserve fanworks and fight censorship, and I had been watching calls for volunteers for positions I was qualified for in order to contribute to those efforts. I’d recently gotten much more into fanwork preservation when I began working at a library with a zine collection, where I was managing cataloguing and shelving a backlog of donated zines. Project management and working with spreadsheets is a lot of fun! When I saw the application for the administrative volunteer position, it seemed in line with my interests and skills, so I applied.

(Coincidentally, and unbeknownst to me when I applied, the library I was working at is one of Open Doors’ partner institutions for our Fan Culture Preservation Project, which helps connect donors with physical fanworks to libraries and archives with zine collections. Some of the donations I was processing were facilitated with the help of Open Doors!)

What has been your biggest challenge doing work for the OTW?
It’s absolutely task management. Our process for importing an archive is over a hundred steps long and some of those require a lot of prep work and communication between people. And that’s not even including documentation or other administrative work! Thankfully, through the miracle of digital checklists and automatic reminders, as well as the detailed procedure instructions Open Doors has written over the years, it’s not too difficult to keep on top of everything. Plus, I have my lovely fellow committee members to help out when I need it :)

What fannish things do you like to do?
I read a lot of fanfiction these days, especially longfics—the one I’m currently reading is over 430k words long and still being published. I also really like to leave long comments on the fics I read. It’s a lot of fun to get that sweet, sweet AO3 email that the author responded to me! Recently, I started writing fanfiction for the first time in several years. Joining a new fandom really helped get those creative juices flowing.


Now that our volunteer’s said five things about what they do, it’s your turn to ask one more thing! Feel free to ask about their work in the comments. Or if you’d like, you can check out previous Five Things posts.

The Organization for Transformative Works is the non-profit parent organization of multiple projects including Archive of Our Own, Fanlore, Open Doors, Transformative Works and Cultures, and OTW Legal Advocacy. We are a fan-run, entirely donor-supported organization staffed by volunteers. Find out more about us on our website.

Remembering

Nov. 30th, 2025 07:44 am
susandennis: (Default)
[personal profile] susandennis
Still no cure.

December posts invitation

Dec. 1st, 2025 06:46 am
sonia: Quilted wall-hanging (Default)
[personal profile] sonia
It doesn't seem like posting every day in December is really a thing anymore on Dreamwidth, but I enjoy the challenge of it, so I'm going to try it again this year. I may miss a day here and there.

As is traditional, if you have questions or topics you'd like me to write about, please drop them in comments!
siderea: (Default)
[personal profile] siderea
Canonical link: https://siderea.dreamwidth.org/1888828.html




Hey, Americans and people living in the US going through open enrollment on the state ACA marketplaces who haven't yet enrolled in a plan for 2026!

Just about every state in the union and DC (but not Idaho) proudly touts an end date to open enrollment sometime in January. This year for most states it ends January 15th, but in CA, NJ, NY, RI, and DC, it's January 31st, and here in Massachusetts, it's January 23rd. (Idaho's is December 15th.) [Source]

That sure sounds like the deadline is sometime in January.

No, it kinda isn't.

tl;dr: Just assume if you want insurance to start Jan 1, the deadlines are to enroll by Dec 8 and to pay for the first month by Dec 15. Important deets within. [950 words] )

This post brought to you by the 220 readers who funded my writing it – thank you all so much! You can see who they are at my Patreon page. If you're not one of them, and would be willing to chip in so I can write more things like this, please do so there.

Please leave comments on the Comment Catcher comment, instead of the main body of the post – unless you are commenting to get a copy of the post sent to you in email through the notification system, then go ahead and comment on it directly. Thanks!

Scope of "more than"

Dec. 1st, 2025 09:20 am
[syndicated profile] languagelog_feed

Posted by Mark Liberman

"The hottest new AI company is…Google?", CNN 11/29/2025, shows a slide telling us that Google Search is "Bringing Generative AI to more people than any product in the world":

Jonathan Smith, who sent in the link, commented

"to more people than our competitors" yes, "to more people than there are fish in the sea" yes, "to more people than e.g. potable water [is brought]" really…?

The syntax and semantics of "more than" constructions are complicated, in ways that sometimes lead to Escher Sentences.

I collected a sample of real-world sentences illustrating various corners of Jonathan's question, but I think I'll leave this one open for readers to explore.

 

Reading Wrap-up 11/25

Dec. 1st, 2025 07:28 am
vamp_ress: (Default)
[personal profile] vamp_ress posting in [community profile] booknook
In hindsight, it seems my November was horror-reading month. I swear, I hadn't planned it this way, but I won't complain. 

Purcell, Laura: Bone China. Bloomsbury. 2019.
I've been reading her books for a few years now, picking one up every autumn. She's a contemporary author, but she writes in the vein of gothic fiction - there are a lot of remote mansions and haunted castles in her books. Bone China features a remote manor on a cliff, an unreliable narrator and the question of what is truly happening and what is actually only taking place in the protagonist's head. Purcell is really good with the psychological horror. If that's your kind of thing you should definitely check her out.

Moreno-Garcia, Silvia: Mexican Gothic. Del Rey. 2020.
This was my first time with a novel by Moreno-Garcia. I felt that thematically, this was all over the place. Apart from the fact that it's horror it also tried to tackle themes like racism, classism, eugenics and mysoginy, but it didn't spend enough time on any of these themes to make it worthwhile. Additionally, this has a historical setting (the 1950/1960s) even though this is never fully realised and you wonder why the author chose to take this route (probably only to constantly talk about the dress the protagonist was wearing, I don't know). And when we got to the bottom of why the house was "haunted" I basically got off the plane - this is a personal thing of course, but I found this rather silly instead of terrifying. What I really liked was the gothic vibes she managed to evoke while describing the house. The atmosphere and the creepy dreams (that only get creepier as the story progresses) were my highlights.

Tremblay, Paul: Horror Movie. HarperAudio. 2024.
Tremblay simply has the best audiobook productions and this was top-notch as well. If you want to give this novel a try, do yourself a favour and consider the audiobook! I can't say that I fully bought into the "haunted set" idea and most of the characters felt flat and hardly realised, but Tremblay is really good with mixed media. There are several POVs and a screenplay in this. But the novel wasn't overly scary or frightening.

Feito, Virginia: Victorian Psycho. Audible Audio. 2025.
As a project this is very well done and successful, but as a book on its own I find it forgettable. As the title says this marries American Psycho to a Jane Eyre-like plot. The language was the most interesting thing about this, because just like in American Psycho the narration starts off very tame and proper only to get more unhinged as the story progresses. I think that progression was the highlight of the novel and very well done. On the other hand, it was riffing off what Ellis has already done decades ago, so I'm not sure how much of the credit (besides the idea of the Victorian setting) can really go to Feito. In the end, mostly a fanfiction remix even if it's executed extremely well.

Kröger, Lisa & Anderson, Melanie R.: Monster, She wrote! The Women Who Prioneered Horror and Speculative Fiction. Quirk Books. 2018.
Let's start this by saying that this is a beautifully done book. It was quite obviously typeset before the pandemic and before paper became scarce and expensive - there's a lot of free and waste of space here and it's wonderful to see a book "breathe" like that. Happens rarely enough. Sadly, this nonfiction read didn't fully give me what I had expected. Yes, I filled up my TBR because the authors truly manage to find a lot of hidden gems. But I had definitely expected more literary criticism, more in-depth analysis. In the end, this was pretty much snorkeling just below the surface.

Doerr, Anthony: Cloud Cuckoo Land. Scribner. 2021.
I only read this because Ben from Ben reads good gave this a glowing review. Half an hour into the (German) audiobook of 16 hours I thought this would be 16 hours of pure torture. In the end, it wasn't quite that bad, but I can't say that the book and I had a successful time with each other. The "hook" - the Greek epic connecting all the different timelines was as silly as the title suggests and had I known that this would fully be shouldered by kid and teenage protagonists I would have opted out before I even started. I just didn't care for any of it. Okay, that's not true. I cared for the poor beasts of burden who died somewhere in the middle - but even that was mostly the author emotionally manipulating the reader, so I don't know what to make of this.

140 in 1400 List

Dec. 1st, 2025 06:58 am
zhelana: (Original - Can't Brain)
[personal profile] zhelana
Checking in on goals

Finished This Month

Cook 12 times 2025


Progress this Month

Exercise every day in 2025
Brush teeth 360 times in 2025
Shower weekly 2025
Art Every Day 2025
Write in Spanish every day of 2025
Finish my memoirs
Write weekly 2025
Read 2 pages of Spanish every day 2025
Clean 2 minutes per weekday 2025
Clean 10 minutes per week 2025
roina_arwen: Lilo kissing Stitch on the cheek (Lilo & Stitch Kiss - Stressed Stitch)
[personal profile] roina_arwen
“Locke Bed and Breakfast, how can I help you?”

I was a pro at answering our phone lines, but still had occasional issues with operating our recently updated computerized reservation system. I was so used to the old-fashioned schedule book, like mom and dad always used, that it was going to take a while to learn how to do everything the new way.

“Yes ma’am,” the caller said, clearing his throat. “I just wanted to double-check that you had our reservation for this weekend, arriving on Friday the fourteenth and departing on Monday the seventeenth?”

“What name is the reservation under,” I asked him, entering my password to unlock the screen.

“Baehr,” he replied. More This Way )

Review: Forever and a Day

Nov. 30th, 2025 08:20 pm
[syndicated profile] eaglereviews_feed

Review: Forever and a Day, by Haley Cass

Series: Those Who Wait #1.5
Publisher: Haley Cass
Copyright: 2020
ISBN: 979-8-5902-5966-3
Format: Kindle
Pages: 101

Forever and a Day is a coda to Haley Cass's self-published sapphic romance novel Those Who Wait. There is no point in reading it unless you have already read and enjoyed the full book and wanted more of a denouement.

Given that Those Who Wait is a romance novel, it is definitionally not a spoiler to reveal that Sutton and Charlotte ended up together. This novella is seven scenes sketching out the next few years of their lives, interspersed with press clippings and social media commentary. These tie up loose ends, give the characters a bit more time together, throw in one more conflict and resolution, add one more sex scene, and stick a few exclamation points after the happily ever after.

I am the sort of person who likes long denouements in stories, so I'm the target audience for this sort of sequel that's essentially additional chapters to the book. (The funniest version of this I've read is Jacqueline Carey's Saints Astray.) They are usually not great literature, since there are good reasons for not including these chapters in the book. That is exactly what this is: a few more chapters of the characters being happy, entirely forgettable, and of interest only to people who want that.

Cass does try to introduce a bit of a plot via some light family conflict, which was sweet and mostly worked, and some conflict over having children, which was very stereotyped and which I did not enjoy as much. I thought the earlier chapters of this novella were the stronger ones, although I do have to give the characters credit in the later chapters for working through conflict in a mature and fairly reasonable way. It does help, though, when the conflict is entirely resolved by one character being right and the other character being happily wrong. That's character conflict on easy mode.

I was happy to see that Sutton got a career, although as in the novel I wish Cass had put some more effort into describing Sutton's efforts in building that career. The details are maddeningly vague, which admittedly matches the maddeningly vague description of Charlotte's politics but which left me unsatisfied.

Charlotte's political career continues to be pure wish fulfillment in the most utterly superficial and trivialized way, and it bothered me even more in the novella than it did in the novel. We still have absolutely no idea what she stands for, what she wants to accomplish, and why anyone would vote for her, and yet we get endless soft-focus paeans to how wonderful she will be for the country. Her opponents are similarly vague to the point that the stereotypes Cass uses to signal their inferiority to Charlotte are a little suspect.

I'm more critical of this in 2025 than I would have been in 2015 because the last ten years have made clear the amount of damage an absolute refusal to stand for anything except hazy bromides causes, and I probably shouldn't be this annoyed that Cass chose to vaguely gesture towards progressive liberalism without muddying her romance denouement with a concrete political debate. But, just, gah. I found the last chapter intensely annoying, in part because the narrative of that chapter was too cliched and trite to sufficiently distract me from the bad taste of the cotton-candy politics.

Other than that, this was minor, sweet, and forgettable. If you want another few chapters of an already long novel, this delivers exactly what you would expect. If the novel was plenty, nothing about this novella is going to change your mind and you can safely skip it. I really liked the scene between Charlotte and Sutton's mom, though, and I'm glad I read the novella just for that.

Rating: 6 out of 10

emotional support fiber

Nov. 30th, 2025 08:53 pm
yhlee: Alto clef and whole note (middle C). (Default)
[personal profile] yhlee
Continuing from the earlier experiment, emotional support weaving with handspun weft:

weaving WIP

Tension management is a mess with this (experimental, non-destructive) setup but I figured I'd at least weave this warp, write this off as a learning experience (I did learn a lot) + disaster-mode "weaving" art therapy, and move on. :)

I also learned that I strongly dislike making very "loose," airy weaves structurally, so that's good to know about myself. I sometimes like them in fabrics made by machines/other people but I don't enjoy weaving them, so I'll avoid in the future!

Profile

jeshyr: Blessed are the broken. Harry Potter. (Default)
Ricky Buchanan